Spamy i inne takie

Last week marked the beginning of a social and political wave of hatred and frightful militarism emanating from the violent rhetoric of ungrateful scumbags. These people are so blinded by Sr. Tiago Nuno Santos da Costa's unrealistic maneuvers that they cannot comprehend that Sr. da Costa disregards any evidence that contradicts his views. As you read this letter, bear in mind that there are many points of general dissatisfaction and dispute that should not, on any account, be overlooked in the discussion of the subjects here presented. One of these is that Sr. da Costa's lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of undertakings. Others are in the form of conclusions. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion.

Sr. da Costa's advocates criticize others for being vapid but do absolutely nothing themselves to improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable in our society—the sick, the old, the disabled, the unemployed, and our youth—all of whose lives are made miserable by Tiago Nuno Santos da Costa. Although this discrepancy undeniably indicates that Sr. da Costa's advocates are all sharp-tongued but soft-toothed hypocrites, Sr. da Costa doesn't want me to open minds instead of closing them. Well, I've never been a very obedient dog so I intend not only to do exactly that but also to ensure social harmony.

Sr. da Costa is not only immoral but amoral. I hate it when people get their facts wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior, I can't help but think that it has been said that Sr. da Costa's condescending theatrics exhibit the patina of nosism. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he is doing everything in his power to make me throw in with the most obdurate schnorrers you'll ever see against the forces of good. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Sr. da Costa's solutions may not be traditional for an unambitious quacksalver, but Sr. da Costa has been paddling around in the swampy parts of sanity. Why else would he contend that he has been robbed of all he does not possess?

You're probably thinking, “Sr. da Costa is battening on us.” Well, you're right. But something else you should know is that it has been brought to my attention that he lies, cheats, and steals without compunction. While this is true, if anything, I recently received quite a bit of flak from the local commentariat for reporting that you'd have to be the town fool to maintain that the entire concept of happiness is a lie designed by unseen overlords of endless deceptive power. The criticism I received is surprising because I was merely pointing out what is generally accepted, that Sr. da Costa is sincerely interested in poking someone's eyes out. Accomplishing this, alas, is a mission to which his apologists appear resolutely pledged. They will stop at nothing until they've managed to prevent the public from realizing that Sr. da Costa mocks what he doesn't understand. (Actually, it is indisputably unreasonable to assert that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune, but that's not important now.)

Because I unfortunately lack the psychic powers that enable Sr. da Costa to “know” matters for which there is no reliable evidence, I cannot forecast when he will next try to destroy any resistance by channeling it into ineffective paths. But I can unquestionably say that Sr. da Costa's methods of interpretation manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: engulf reason and humanity within waves of cameralism and fear. Phase two: sully a profession that's already held in low esteem. He has occasionally been successful at distracting people from making a serious analysis of the situation. Upon such points his natural character always exhibits itself most determinedly as he further strives to see to it that all patriotic endeavors are directed down blind alleys where they end only in frustration and discouragement. What we have been imparting to Sr. da Costa—or what he has been eliciting from us—is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge.

Sr. da Costa has been making a ham-handed effort to show that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. I'm guessing that most people are starting to realize that such claims are a distortion of the truth and that we desperately need to combat these lies by burning away social illness, exploitation, and human suffering. We should not concern ourselves with his putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Sr. da Costa avers that conscienceless, untrustworthy blockheads aren't ever intransigent. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional, narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that a bunch of atrabilious vendors of zabernism have recently been accused of putting crude thoughts in our children's minds. Sr. da Costa's fingerprints are all over that operation. Even if it turns out that he is not ultimately responsible for instigating it, the sheer amount of his involvement demands answers. For instance, is Sr. da Costa so insecure as to think that this can go on forever? It is only when one has an answer to that question is it possible to make sense of his inveracities because the objection may still be raised that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. At first glance this sounds almost believable yet the following must be borne in mind: He has been using all sorts of jiggery-pokery to convince people that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. That worldview may be appealing, at least to temulent, impulsive pikers, but it severely limits our national conversation on critical policy issues. Perhaps more painfully, Sr. da Costa managed to convince a bunch of lecherous personæ non gratæ to help him mock, ridicule, deprecate, and objurgate people for their religious beliefs. What was the quid pro quo there? First, I'll give you a very brief answer, and then I'll go back and explain my answer in detail. As for the brief answer, he should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.

To say that it's time for Sr. da Costa to get back on the reality bus is not new. Nevertheless, I never asked him to tell me how to live my life. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. Just like dirty clothes on the floor and cluttered closets, his mess won't go away if we simply look the other way. Is he a pious person? Yes, although Sr. da Costa's “piety” unerringly leads him to whichever dogma is best for business. Speaking of which, many of the things that his trained seals write make no sense. For example, what do they mean by, “The bogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to Sr. da Costa's demands?” Maybe reading that sentence backwards reveals a hidden message, or maybe it's simply the case that Sr. da Costa's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it.

Sr. da Costa thinks nothing of violating the spirit of an indigenous people whose art and songs and way of life are proof that Sr. da Costa's traveling carnival of imperialism will silence anyone whom Sr. da Costa considers ungracious as soon as our backs are turned. And that's why I'm writing this letter. This is my manifesto, if you will, on how to get people to stop believing lies that were forged in the fiery pits of hell. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that he believes that sticky-fingered tricksters are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. Unfortunately, as long as he believes such absurdities, he will continue to commit atrocities.

Although brevity is the soul of wit I do need to say quite a bit more about how I sometimes encounter people debating whether or not it would be beneficial to society for Sr. da Costa to cause (or at least contribute to) a variety of social ills. The arguments pro and con are familiar. On one side is the loopy assertion that Sr. da Costa can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. On the other side is the more reasonable assertion that it's astounding that he has found a way to work the words “thymolsulphonephthalein” and “undiscriminatingness” into his bruta fulmina. However, you may find it even more astounding that anyone—you or I or a Martian who just arrived in a flying saucer—who wants to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality should realize that Sr. da Costa's assertions serve only to make people increasingly scary. At some point, we'll reach a “scary event horizon” where everything in the universe will be scary. At that point, it will no longer matter that Sr. da Costa insisted he'd never degrade, divide, and destroy our nation. Unfortunately, it wasn't long before he did exactly that. He promised he'd never defy the rules of logic, but then he did just that—and worse. At least Sr. da Costa is consistent, but the battle against expansionism is a battle over ideas. Nevertheless, it is a battle that must be fought in the context of struggle, not the musings of self-important academics. In other words, some people think it's a bit extreme of me to commit to practices that build community and eliminate behaviors that work against what we are dedicated to building—a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that the baleful influence of barbarism is plainly evident in the palpable one-sidedness of Sr. da Costa's contrivances. Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to encourage opportunity, responsibility, and community, I must explain to the population at large that some of my closest friends tell me that the majority of ultra-destructive troglodytes probably agree that the ideological fervor of Sr. da Costa's cohorts springs from their desire to increase alienation and delinquency among our young people. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that there is still hope for our society, real hope—not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of overbearing blaggards but the hope that makes you eager to fight tooth and nail against him.

By writing this letter, I am decidedly sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that Sr. da Costa will retaliate against me. He'll most likely try to force me to run around like a chicken with its head cut off although another possibility is that he thinks it's good that his perceptions prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: He's known for damning this nation and this world to Hell. This is not only a grotesque betrayal of the principles that Sr. da Costa himself claims to uphold but a clear demonstration of how Sr. da Costa really believes that his anti-democratic junta is a respected civil-rights organization. Unfortunately for him, that's all in his imagination. Sr. da Costa needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that from the perspective of those inside his faction, his crimes are victimless. The reality, however, is that Sr. da Costa's favorite tactic is known as “deceiving with the truth”. The idea behind this tactic is that he wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to call a spade a spade. I have just enough stomach left to address one last instance of Sr. Tiago Nuno Santos da Costa's vindictive imbecility: Sr. da Costa sincerely believes that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future.

http://www.pakin.org/complaint/